https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35943 Wed 05 Aug 2020 13:34:13 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35254 Thu 04 Jul 2019 14:24:19 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:36713 mid‐ephemeral catchments (5–50% zero flows) the explicit approach improves predictive performance, especially reliability, through better characterization of residual errors; (2) BC0.2 and BC0.5 schemes are Pareto optimal in mid‐ephemeral catchments (when the explicit approach is used): BC0.2 achieves better reliability and is recommended for probabilistic prediction, whereas BC0.5 attains lower volumetric bias; (3) in low‐ephemeral catchments (<5% zero flows) the pragmatic approach is sufficient; (4) in high‐ephemeral catchments (>50% zero flows) theoretical limitations result in poor performance of these particular explicit and pragmatic approaches, and further development is needed. The findings provide guidance on improving probabilistic streamflow predictions in ephemeral catchments.]]> Fri 26 Jun 2020 09:47:43 AEST ]]>